<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lutheran Resources for the Daily Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://retinenda.com/2009/06/lutheran-resources-for-the-daily-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://retinenda.com/2009/06/lutheran-resources-for-the-daily-office/</link>
	<description>Latīnam linguam retinēmus propter hōs, qui Latīnē discunt atque intelligunt. --- Ap. XXIV</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Pearce</title>
		<link>http://retinenda.com/2009/06/lutheran-resources-for-the-daily-office/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 03:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retinenda.com/?p=100#comment-61</guid>
		<description>No, that&#039;s it.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theophilus</title>
		<link>http://retinenda.com/2009/06/lutheran-resources-for-the-daily-office/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Theophilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retinenda.com/?p=100#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Sure.

The &lt;em&gt;Vesperale&lt;/em&gt; is quite usable, if you know what you&#039;re doing. What is lacking is a clear presentation of the ordo with rubrics (like what one finds in the BPB). It appears that Ludecus (as well as most authors of offices books from this period from what I can tell) assumed that his audience already knew a lot about Latin prayer offices. This was probably a safe assumption in the sixteenth century. Therefore the &lt;em&gt;Vesperale&lt;/em&gt; can be a bit confusing at times, and lacking the information one would like. Still, however, when coupled with the BPB (or a Breviarium Romanum if you know how to use that), Ludecus&#039; &lt;em&gt;Vesperale&lt;/em&gt; becomes a delightful and very usable resource.

Do you have any other specific questions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure.</p>
<p>The <em>Vesperale</em> is quite usable, if you know what you&#8217;re doing. What is lacking is a clear presentation of the ordo with rubrics (like what one finds in the BPB). It appears that Ludecus (as well as most authors of offices books from this period from what I can tell) assumed that his audience already knew a lot about Latin prayer offices. This was probably a safe assumption in the sixteenth century. Therefore the <em>Vesperale</em> can be a bit confusing at times, and lacking the information one would like. Still, however, when coupled with the BPB (or a Breviarium Romanum if you know how to use that), Ludecus&#8217; <em>Vesperale</em> becomes a delightful and very usable resource.</p>
<p>Do you have any other specific questions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Pearce</title>
		<link>http://retinenda.com/2009/06/lutheran-resources-for-the-daily-office/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://retinenda.com/?p=100#comment-58</guid>
		<description>You wouldn&#039;t mind saying a bit more about the Vesperale et Matutinale would you? Is it usable?

I pray morning prayer most days, and use different resources. I&#039;d be delighted to have a Lutheran Latin resource, if it did the job.

The BPP is well done, I agree, as is the Sacrosanctae.

I dig the recordings, by the way. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldn&#8217;t mind saying a bit more about the Vesperale et Matutinale would you? Is it usable?</p>
<p>I pray morning prayer most days, and use different resources. I&#8217;d be delighted to have a Lutheran Latin resource, if it did the job.</p>
<p>The BPP is well done, I agree, as is the Sacrosanctae.</p>
<p>I dig the recordings, by the way. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
